THE CURRENT POLITICAL PREDICAMENT

Herman Cain

Herman Cain

The GOP primaries have provided a story line that writers of “Desperate Housewives” might envy. Herman Cain surprised many political pundits by ascending in the polls above some established political figures. His popularity was gathering momentum until a series of sexual harassment allegations surfaced.

Politico first broke the news Oct. 31 that two women had previously filed sexual harassment claims against Cain 20 years earlier when he ran the National Restaurant Association. Karen Krashaar publicly acknowledged the claim a week later, the day after a third woman, Sharon Bialek, accused Cain of making sexual advances towards her when she was pursuing a job with him.

The women in the life of Herman Cain

The women in the life of Herman Cain (Google Images)

Cain, of course, denied the allegations, but also claimed no memory of them. Later he recanted and remembered a settlement with one of the women. He refused to surrender to what he considered a smear campaign – that is until a fourth allegation surfaced.

On Nov. 28, Ginger White, a long-time friend of Cain, publicly announced that she had participated in an extramarital affair with Cain for 13 years. Both Can and White were married during that time. Once again, Cain boldly denounced the claim, but the damage was done. Five days later, he pulled out of the race, “because of the continued distractions, because of the continued hurt … on me, on my family ….”

Newt Gingrich

Newt Gingrich

Last week, as Newt Gingrich was gaining ground on frontrunner, Mitt Romney, Gingrich’s second wife, Marianne, did an interview with ABC. Marianne married Gingrich in 1981, six months after he acquired a divorce from his first wife of 18 years. In the interview, Marianne claims that during marital counseling, Gingrich made a request for an open marriage that would allow him to continue an affair with a mistress, while he worked on their marriage.

Gingrich divorced Marianne in 1999. During the proceedings, Gingrich admitted to an ongoing affair with Callista Bisek since 1993. Gingrich married Callista in August of 2000.

During a public debate of the GOP candidates last week, Gingrich refuted that he asked for an open marriage. Both of his daughters by his first marriage have defended him against Marianne’s claims. They also say that he has changed and grown closer to God. On Saturday, Gingrich won the South Carolina primary by 13% over Romney.

Newt Gingrich's wives: Jackie, Marianne, Callista

Newt Gingrich’s wives: Jackie, Marianne, Callista (Google Images)

Whether all of Marianne’s allegations measure up to veracity, Gingrich’s moral character appears questionable. While he stumped for family values and condemned President Clinton for moral failure in the 90’s, Gingrich was living in adultery – for the second time. At the least, this shouts of hypocrisy.

It may be too simplistic, but it appears that voters are willing to overlook one form of moral indiscretion, adultery, but not another, sexual harassment. Does morality play a role in politics and governing? Should society hold its political leaders to a standard of moral integrity? Which standard?

John Adams believed that morality plays a vital role in the survival of a democratic society. In a speech to the military in 1798, he stated, “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.… Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

In a message to the Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church in North America, George Washington declared, “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.” In his Farewell Address of 1796, he said, “the government … can never be in danger of degenerating into a monarchy, an oligarchy, an aristocracy or any other despotic or oppressive form so long as there shall remain any virtue in the body of the people.”

Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie hosted the reality show, The Simple Life

Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie hosted the reality show, The Simple Life (mavrixphoto.com)

The fickleness of the populace with respect to the morality of its leaders parallels the decline in social mores. Celebrities publicly celebrate pregnancies before marriage. Reality stars attract substantial viewers while they display unrestrained self-indulgence and excessive indecency. And fans casually imitate the practices of their idols.

A free society that minimizes external governance assumes internal governance. Internal governance results from self-application of moral standards. When a society abandons those restraints, chaos ensues, requiring increased external governance. Political leaders must understand and practice this foundational principle to a free society. When they compromise morality, they will legislate and protect the same compromises in the populace.

Good luck finding candidates in this generation who are both moral and competent to govern.

Posted in Morality, Politics and Christianity, Virtue | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BEAUTY

The Durgango High School yearbook student staff rejected this photo submitted by Sydney Spies for her senior picture

The Durgango High School yearbook student staff rejected this photo submitted by Sydney Spies for her senior picture

Sydney Spies never imagined that a photo shoot for her high school yearbook would lead to a national news story. Her mother warned her that the shot she selected for her senior class picture might lead to controversy, but even Miki Spies was surprised by the media attention.

The 18-year-old high school student from Durango, Colorado posed on a staircase, looking back over her left shoulder. Wearing a short yellow skirt and a black scarf wrapped around her torso so that it exposes her shoulders and midriff, Spies portrays something more provocative than typical yearbook fare.

A group of her peers thought so, too. The yearbook editorial staff of five students feared the photo would “make our publication seem unprofessional and inappropriate.” The staff also rejected a second photo submitted by Spies in another provocative pose, wearing a form-fitting black mesh strapless dress.

In an interview on the Today show, Spies claimed, “I think it describes who I am. I am an outgoing person and I really do think it is artistic.” She aspires to a modeling career and both photos reflect a model’s portfolio.

The second photo Sydney Spies submitted to the yearbook staff

The second photo Sydney Spies submitted to the yearbook staff

While the photo ignited a controversy over legal rights and freedoms, it also begs for a deeper discussion of Beauty. In December, Pat Archbold wrote a blog for the National Catholic Register entitled, “The Death of Pretty.” Recognizing a debate of meaning, Archbold establishes his definition, “I define pretty as a mutually enriching balanced combination of beauty and projected innocence.”

He contrasted pretty with hotness, which he calls a commodity, something that has only temporal worth and invites to be used rather than valued. Archbold does not identify the means for achieving either projected image, but devices would have to include clothing, makeup and the manner in which a woman presents herself.

The blog precipitated a deluge of comments, mostly favorable. Some thought “projected innocence” introduced confusion and one commenter suggested the combination of beauty and virtue. One could argue that Beauty already exists as a virtue, as something inherently good. In an absolute sense, it cannot be separated from moral excellence.

Beauty satisfies the sense of sight. A brilliant sunset, filling the sky with resplendent color, brings joy and satisfaction. It does not need to be touched. It does not need to be smelled. It delights through sight alone. Many objects may offer additional delights to other senses, such as flowers, but their beauty can stand alone, as photographs prove.

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, consistently receives kudos for the way she frames her beauty.

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, consistently receives kudos for the way she frames her beauty. (Photo credits, from left: Arthur Edwards / Reuters; Chris Jackson / Getty Images; Jae Hong / Associated Press; Mark Large / Getty Images)

Every woman possesses a natural beauty. Like a painting, a frame can draw attention to the beauty or distract from it. Most women want to appear attractive, to elicit a positive visual response. But no woman desires a one-dimensional identity. The complexity of her nature (physical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) demands a corresponding respect and delight. Her beauty projects only one feature of her nature, but the one that is most readily perceived.

Some women complain about the emphasis upon physical appearance and contend that they should not be judged by it. Judging character by appearance often yields disastrous results, but judgment differs from being distracted. Distractions do not imply judgment. Distractions only mean that the appearance can attract inappropriate attention, to see the frame more than the painting.

Women should not disparage physical appearance. God created the body to reflect his glory. When the first man saw a woman for the first time, he was exhilarated (Genesis 2:23). The author comments that the man and woman were naked and were not ashamed (2:25). They did not fear exploitation, devaluation, commodification or abuse. The physical beauty of God’s creation satisfied their sight in the context of purity.

Sin changed that. The man and woman suffered shame. God produced clothing for them. It was necessary to veil their beauty partially in order to restrain the sinful impulses of the other person. Sin subjected the woman’s beauty to possible depreciation due to sinful responses of the observer. Sin interferes with every human interpretation of the created world.

This requires women to use wisdom when framing their beauty. Absolute rules rarely solve the problem, because sinful people invent and interpret those rules. Principles should guide, requiring an understanding of the culture and of human nature. Women must carefully guard their own motives as well as consider the image they project in their appearance.

Many women wisely understand the enhancement of intrinsic beauty without detracting from it. Framing beauty requires prudence, discretion and care. It does not guarantee a pure and wholesome response from the viewer, but it acknowledges the delicate balance between the image of God and a sinful nature in every human.

In an effort to make herself attractive, a woman should avoid appealing to an attraction that goes beyond the visual satisfaction of beauty in itself. The more exposure of the body, the greater the risk of distracting from Beauty. No formula can dictate. Honest discussions between men and women about the effects of female appearance would benefit everyone.

This article only skims the surface of this topic, which needs much more careful consideration than it typically receives. Most people dismiss it too quickly, arguing for relative values and individual freedom (as Sydney Spies does). The pious treat it with an equal shallowness, failing to explore the complexity of beauty, especially as it applies to the human body.

It is neither a male nor female problem alone. We must all own it. It is the consequence of the devastating effects of sin on God’s created order. But his Beauty can be redeemed and restored among those who “put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness.” (Ephesians 4:24)

Posted in Beauty, Culture, Sexuality, Uncategorized, Virtue | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

2011 in review

Thank you to all my friends and new acquaintances through the internet who have viewed, commented and supported my blog this past year. May we all continue to seek the truth in Jesus, the Way, the Truth, the Life.

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 3,500 times in 2011. If it were a cable car, it would take about 58 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LOSING SIGHT OF THE MISSION

“This show is harmful, education-wise, to your belief structure? Is that not the purpose of education, to replace your belief structure with facts?”

 

Cast of TLC's "All-American Family"

Cast of TLC’s “All-American Family”

Jon Stewart,  host of Comedy Central’s “Daily Show,” made this remark in response to Lowe’s withdrawal of its advertising from the new reality show on TLC, “All-American Muslim.” The Learning Channel calls it “a powerful series that goes inside the rarely seen world of American Muslims to uncover a unique community struggling to balance faith and nationality in a post 9/11 world.”

The Florida Family Association, a conservative evangelical cultural watchdog group, determined the show was more insidious than its benign veneer depicts. “Clearly this program is attempting to manipulate Americans into ignoring the threat of jihad and to influence them to believe that being concerned about the jihad threat would somehow victimize these nice people in this show.”

FFA issued an email to every company supporting the show through advertising, urging them to withdraw their advertising dollars. The organization’s web site claims that “75 companies targeted with emails did not advertise again during the December 11th and 12th episodes.” FFA does not clarify whether these companies officially withdrew their ads, or just did not schedule ads for that particular episode.

David Caton, Executive Director of Florida Family Association

David Caton, Executive Director of Florida Family Association

David Caton, executive director of FFA, wrote in his email campaign, “The show profiles only Muslims that appear to be ordinary folks while excluding many Islamic believers whose agenda poses a clear and present danger to the liberties and traditional values that the majority of Americans cherish.” Caton calls for “balance and truth.”

This kind of fundamentalism does not lack sincerity. These evangelicals believe they are protecting America’s fundamental freedoms and preserving this country’s Christian values. But their sincerity blinds them to the very “balance and truth” they seek.

Would Caton have demanded a guest appearance by Fred Phelps on “Touched By An Angel?” Phelps pastors Westboro Baptist Church, an extremist Christian group that demonstrates at the funerals of American soldiers killed in Iraq with signs like “God hates fags.” Or would he have wanted an episode of “The Andy Griffith Show” to depict the Christian elements of the Ku Klux Klan?

Right-wing pundits (from left clockwise) Niall Ferguson, Glenn Back, Jonah Goldberg, Ann Coulter

Right-wing pundits (from left clockwise) Niall Ferguson, Glenn Back, Jonah Goldberg, Ann Coulter

This right-wing patriotism seems to detract Christians from the real mission of Jesus’ followers. Jesus never once intimated nationalism as a kingdom value (unless one argues for his priority of Israel in God’s program up to his generation). Where does America’s manifest destiny appear in Scriptures?

Jesus did not instruct his disciples, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel. Then gather the believers into one nation and erect high ideological walls that prevent usurpers from disrupting your comfortable religiosity – and prosperity.”

Jesus was unquestionably an Israelite, but he was not at home on earth. Neither the Roman government nor the Jewish leaders welcomed him. Persecution drove most of his followers from Israel.

Everywhere that nationalism has been kneaded with the Christian mission, the mission was corrupted by a lust for political power, and compassion and love were choked out by a perverse form of justice.

The Jaafar family (left) and Amen family (right) of "All-American Muslim"

The Jaafar family (left) and Amen family (right) of “All-American Muslim”

Of what should the Church fear? Persecution? Didn’t Paul say, “all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted” (2 Timothy 3:12). I think Jesus declared, “Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven” (Matthew 5:10-12).

Has our privileged earthly status warped our vision of the kingdom? The kingdom of our citizenship does not have geographical borders.

No other religious system or political ideology poses any real threat to it, for not even the gates of hell will prevail against it. We derive our freedom from truth, not from government legislation or boycotts.

While fundamentalists frantically paced the internet last week, people were entering the kingdom of God through the gospel all over the world, unaffected by “All-American Muslim” or Florida Family Association.

We should not deny the threat of Islamist extremists, any more than we should ignore the claims of a mass killer in Norway who identified himself as a Christian crusader, protecting Norway’s traditional Christian values. Radical behavior of these kinds of fanatics must be prevented.

But don’t let that distract us from the ultimate calling of Jesus on his followers, “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations.” Matthew 28:19

Posted in Christians and Muslims, Christians Engaging Culture, Kingdom of God, Mission, Politics and Christianity | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

TEBOW TIME

 

Tim Tebow scrambles during a fourth-quarter rally against the Chicago Bears Sunday, Dec. 11 (John Leyba, The Denver Post)

Tim Tebow scrambles during a fourth-quarter rally against the Chicago Bears Sunday, Dec. 11 (John Leyba, The Denver Post)

He did it again Sunday. Tim Tebow steered the Denver Broncos to another come-from-behind victory. Five times this season he has forged fourth-quarter rallies to win. When he assumed the quarterback position, the Broncos were 1-4. Now they are 8-5. You do the math.

Critics denigrate his passing ability. His slow release and less-than-optimum arm position result in faulty spirals and missed targets. When he scrambles, he runs more like a fullback than the most prized player on the team, leaving the Broncos only one injury away from the end of their mythical season.

Yet, when the fourth quarter begins (aka Tebow Time), many of those critics would still want Tim Tebow piloting their team.

Competitive greatness. Inspiring leadership. Unshakable optimism. Tenacious determination. These qualities more than compensate for missing skills.

Phil. 4:6-7 etched in Tim's eye black (examiner.com)

Phil. 4:6-7 etched in Tim’s eye black (examiner.com)

Also attracting critique are his unashamed expressions of Christian faith. His one-knee prayer on the sideline before the game has won a new dictionary entry, “Tebowing.” Postgame interviews always include references to Jesus Christ and God. In college (where he led Florida to two national titles and won a Heisman trophy), etched Bible references in the black grease under his eyes testified to his faith.

David Haugh of the Chicago Tribune exposes the hypocrisy of much of this criticism. “Tebow routinely gets mocked for thanking God first in postgame interviews. Yet we mostly shrug when NASCAR drivers thank their sponsors with the first words out of their mouths after winning a race. It’s much cooler for pro athletes to push products than piety. Why?”

Tebow takes a knee for a brief prayer before each game (Newcom)

Tebow takes a knee for a brief prayer before each game (Newcom)

“The act of Tebowing … gets derided, but attention-grabbing choreographed touchdown celebrations get replayed ad nauseum. We act outraged at universities that get carried away treating football as religion yet it makes many people more uneasy to hear an NFL quarterback openly put religion ahead of football.”

Popular sentiment demands that religion remain in the closet. Why? Because aggressive faith produces fanatics who fly planes into buildings. If you possess a spiritual faith, great. Just keep it to yourself. So the advice goes.

Tebow upsets the censor cart. Not only does he freely exhibit his faith, but he does it on a large stage. Nothing captivates the media more than athletic success, except maybe political scandal.

Eight weeks ago, a Google search of Tim Tebow resulted in articles about his college career or NFL draft. He sat on the bench of a basement franchise. Few people expected him to emerge from the sidelines unless he corrected his flawed passing mechanics. Most people never thought about him anymore.

Tebow led the Broncos to an 18-15 OT win against the Miami Dolphins Oct. 23 (Photo by Marc Serota/Getty Images)

Tebow led the Broncos to an 18-15 OT win against the Miami Dolphins Oct. 23 (Photo by Marc Serota/Getty Images)

Then came October 23 and Tebow Time. After two weeks of preparation, he trotted onto the field to direct the Broncos offense. His stats were disastrous through the first three quarters. Behind 15-0 to the winless Miami Dolphins, with five minutes left in the game, Tebow passed for two touchdowns and ran for a 2-point conversion, tying the game. They won in overtime on a field goal.

Critics outweighed supporters after the ugly win and a loss to the Detroit Lions the following week. But he crafted a win against the Raiders the next week and then began a string of fourth-quarter comebacks for wins. Media attention has accumulated every week.

Tebow does not follow the typical interview drivel, deflecting questions about his heroics to the outstanding effort of his teammates. He thanks Jesus for his success, rather than giving some bland reference to God. But he also claims that God is not interested in who wins.

Tebow’s sincerity away from the camera matches his bold witness in the camera. He does not have a reputation for proselytizing teammates. He never comes across as judgmental and exclusionary. He has actively organized fund raisers for charities and spends weeks in the Philippines working with an orphanage.

Tebow escorted Kelly Faughnan to a college football awards banquet Dec. 10, 2009 (Getty Images)

Tebow escorted Kelly Faughnan to a college football awards banquet Dec. 10, 2009 (Getty Images)

In 2009, he was in Florida to attend an awards banquet. The night before, someone introduced him to Kelly Faughnan, who was wearing a button saying, “I love Timmy.” A brain tumor had caused hearing loss and a persistent growth of visible tumors to this 20-year-old student. After visiting with her and her parents, Tebow asked her to escort him as his date at the banquet.

Most people believe that Tebow Time will soon run out. Regardless of his future in the NFL, Tim Tebow’s faith will continue to produce wins. He seems to have learned “how to be brought low … and how to abound” (Philippians 4:12).

As a sportswriter, Haugh doubts that Tebow can hide his passing deficiencies much longer. As a cynic, he believes his one-dimensional game will be short-lived. But as a father, Haugh “hopes his NFL career lasts as long as John Elway’s did,” acknowledging the model of character and inspiration that Tebow provides for the next generation.

Posted in Character, Sports | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments